Daniel Shepherd, Head of Strategy, PHD UAE
There is an ancient Sufi proverb that translates roughly as “There are no signs in the desert saying do not eat the stones.” Now, you might well be wondering why this digital essay is beginning with a millennium-old quote from the people that gave us the great romantic poet Rumi. And it’s not even that the sentence displays all the memorability and irreverence of a superstar copywriter. At its heart is a mantra that should be carved onto the office walls of any digital marketer worth their salt: “Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.”
What makes this mantra particularly relevant today is the all-pervasive and transformative impact – both positive and negative – of the algorithm on advertising. The effect on and benefits to daily life are abundant and obvious. However, in the rush to outsource our thinking to pieces of (often opaque) computer code, there are growing signs that we have been ignoring our own better judgement. Just consider the cost of both the pernicious, like Cambridge Analytica’s weaponization of psychographic targeting, and the more prosaic, such as adland’s damaging focus on efficiency at the expense of effectiveness.
Buying algorithmically has allowed marketers to optimize on the whole range of different digital metrics in the pursuit of increased efficiency. But are we even optimizing on the right KPIs?
For a long time, the scourge of digital has been the desire to plan to what can be easily measured rather than what is right. The logical, yet often neglected, approach has always been to decide what is the best thing to do for your brand and only then work out how to measure it. This has now taken on another dimension as, today, cost optimization is the goal when it should be more effectiveness for less.
Although it’s been six years since Les Binet and Peter Field published ‘The Long and The Short of It’ for the IPA, some marketers are only now acknowledging their mistakes in letting the focus drift from long-term brand building to short-term metrics. Instead of long-term investment in the power of brand, countless brands have prioritized short-term goals that may be easy to measure and optimize but are reductive in the long run.
In essence, just because we can now target organic fish lovers who live in Ajman and play urban golf with a bespoke tailored creative, doesn’t mean we should. The temptation to over-target to individuals’ own personal online experiences often comes at the expense of universal, shared stories.
Whether it is Game of Thrones or the recent Saudi Tourism campaign, both seen in over 50 countries, it’s clear that the power of broad narratives to challenge, entertain, intrigue and delight huge swathes of the population remains intact. This can be efficiently achieved with digital and legacy media like TV, while still benefiting from optimized buying tools and techniques. Great creative, gripping stories and purpose-led challenger brands will always be the source of universal, shared moments that resonate with audiences. When we do our job well, we mirror culture; but when we do it brilliantly, we can help to shape it. A shared narrative can achieve this.
Does this mean we should turn our backs on targeted, personalized digital ads? Far from it. They still serve a purpose, like pushing people down the funnel to the point of transaction. For this, hyper-targeting and dynamic creative optimization can be incredibly effective but even more so when they build on a strong existing brand presence. This is where big, shared stories are hugely important, as the necessary foundation on which the durable brand edifice is built. Otherwise, you get a house of cards.
There are no signs telling us not to blindly embrace the shiniest new thing, but there should be some advising us to constantly question what success really looks like. So, leave no stone unturned in your pursuit of digital excellence. Just don’t eat them.
Daniel Shepherd is Head of Strategy at PHD UAE.
This digital essay was featured in Campaign ME’s November 17th 2019 issue.
